Teat v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the telephone conversations of inmates at penal institutions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Washington v. Meachum
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-06· cited 52×
• Mitchell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-08-27· cited 23×
• Brooks v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-05-06· cited 7×
• Hartley v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2003-12-12· cited 3×
• Garzarek v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-10-04· cited 3×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell v. Wolfish
  Supreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
• Hudson v. Palmer
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
• Sanders v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 2,713×
• Price v. Johnston
  Supreme Court· 1948-05-24· cited 1,320×
• Ex Parte Peoples
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-04-03· cited 60×
• Peoples v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-05-27· cited 59×
• United States v. Clark
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-11-25· cited 26×
• Shuttlesworth v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1962-12-11· cited 15×
• Ex parte Nations
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1963-05-28· cited 7×
• Gurley v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1965-02-02· cited 7×
• Shuttlesworth v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1963-04-04· cited 7×
• Arnold v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1975-07-29· cited 3×
• Appeal of Harris (Naomi)
  Third Circuit· 1988-08-31· cited 1×
• Appeal of Hernandez (Eco)
  Third Circuit· 1989-03-07· cited 1×
• United States v. Hernandez (Eco Nelson)
  Third Circuit· 1989-03-07· cited 1×