Teasley v. Mathis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that elimination of punitive damages under the No- Fault Act except when there are serious injuries does not violate due process, equal protection, or right of access to courts
• considering whether “a rational relationship” existed supporting the elimination of exemplary damages for accident victims who did not sustain “serious injury”
• constitutionality of elimination of exemplary damages under no-fault automobile insurance law is not violative of due process, equal protection, or right of access to courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).