Skip to main content
· 9/18/1984

Teasel v. Department of Mental Health

Citations

  • 355 N.W.2d 75
  • 419 Mich. 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that mandamus “will not lie for the purpose of reviewing, revising, or controlling the exercise of discretion reposed in administrative bodies”
  • “[M]andamus will lie to compel the exercise of discretion, but not to compel its exercise in a particular manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Kavanagh, Levin, Brick-Ley, Boyle, Ryan, Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.