Skip to main content
· 1/22/1987

Teasdale v. Allen

Citations

  • 520 A.2d 295
  • 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing “to adopt any per se rule that standing may be granted only to those whose precise status as intended beneficiaries can be discerned from the four comers of the will itself.”
  • declining “to adopt any per se rule that standing may be granted only to those whose precise status as intended beneficiaries can be discerned from the four corners of the will itself”
  • declining \to adopt any per se rule that standing may be granted only to those whose precise status as intended beneficiaries can be discerned from the four corners of the will itself\
  • refusing “to adopt any per se rule that standing may be granted only to those whose precise status as intended beneficiaries can be discerned from the four corners” of a document
  • expressly rejecting Kirgan and Ventura

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacK, Newman, Steadman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.