· 1/22/1987
Teasdale v. Allen
Citations
- 520 A.2d 295
- 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing “to adopt any per se rule that standing may be granted only to those whose precise status as intended beneficiaries can be discerned from the four comers of the will itself.”
- declining “to adopt any per se rule that standing may be granted only to those whose precise status as intended beneficiaries can be discerned from the four corners of the will itself”
- declining \to adopt any per se rule that standing may be granted only to those whose precise status as intended beneficiaries can be discerned from the four corners of the will itself\
- refusing “to adopt any per se rule that standing may be granted only to those whose precise status as intended beneficiaries can be discerned from the four corners” of a document
- expressly rejecting Kirgan and Ventura
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacK, Newman, Steadman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.