Skip to main content
· 8/17/1989

Teamsters Local No. 579 v. B & M Transit, Inc.

Citations

  • 882 F.2d 274
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 803
  • 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2255
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12515
  • 112 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 11,422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the state's arbitration statute of limitations to a decision by a joint grievance committee panel comprised of management and labor representatives
  • affirming motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s complaint to enforce an arbitration award
  • “While a court must not sanction a party for a reasonable misconstruction of case law, a party is not entitled to deliberately ignore or misstate case law.”
  • “When possible, . . . a court should avoid remanding a decision to the arbitrator because of the interest in prompt 1 As the district court noted, if in the future Hunt suspects that BNSF is in breach of what the Award declared to be BNSF’s section 3(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Will

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.