Teal v. Prasad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an ‘expert opinion based upon only hypothetical situations is not enough to demonstrate a legitimate causal connection between a defect and injury,’ and ‘there must be facts in evidence to support the opinion testimony of an expert.’”
• “[T]here must be facts in evidence to support the opinion testimony of an expert.”
• “[T]here must be facts in evidence to support the opinion testimony of an expert.”
• generally requiring expert testimony on causation in a medical malpractice action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).