Teal v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims brought under the Rehabilitation Act are subject to the exhaustion requirements outlined in Title VII
• explaining that claims brought under the Rehabilitation Act are subject to the exhaustion requirements outlined in Title VII
• explaining that claims brought under the Rehabilitation Act are subject to the exhaustion requirements outlined in Title VII
• observing that Rehabilitation Act plaintiffs “can seek relief pursuant to the procedures and requirements outlined in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which include exhausting administrative remedies prior to bringing suit.”
• observing that Rehabilitation Act plaintiffs “can seek relief pursuant to the procedures and requirements outlined in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which include exhausting administrative remedies prior to bringing suit.”
• observing that Rehabilitation Act plaintiffs “can seek relief pursuant to the procedures and requirements outlined in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which include exhausting administrative remedies prior to bringing suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).