Teague v. City of Flower Mound

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “scintilla” of public concern does not transform a private employment matter into a matter of public concern
• \Utilizing the simpler `citizen versus employer' approach produces . . . the same result.\
• finding speech unprotected where, “[a]though interspersed with apparently genuine concerns regarding police wrongdoing, [the plaintiffs’] grievances were primarily motivated by, and primarily addressed, concerns particular to their private interests”
• “Utilizing the simpler ‘citizen versus employer’ approach produces ... the same result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).