Teague v. City of Canton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the City impliedly accepted an offer of dedication of a sewer system because it offered sewer tap-on permits to homeowners, processed the sewage that flowed through the disputed lines, and charged the homeowners for the service
• it is the government’s exercise of dominion and control of the property which indicates acceptance of the dedication
• “To prove a dedication of land to public use, there must be an offer, either express or implied, by the owner of the land, and an acceptance, either express or implied, by the appropriate public authorities or the general public.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).