TEACHING CO. LTD. PARTNER. v. Unapix Entertainment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Suggestive marks are considered to be strong and entitled to the greatest protection against infringement.”
• “When a defendant adopts a mark with full knowledge of the plaintiffs mark, intent is inferred.”
• $11 million in advertising and $6 million in sales over an eight-year period weighed toward finding secondary meaning
• permanent injunction is appropriate when future violations are a “continuing threat”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).