Skip to main content
· 11/14/2003

T.D. v. Lagrange School District No. 102

Citations

  • 349 F.3d 469
  • 3 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 755
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23236
  • 2003 WL 22682466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a private settlement without judicial imprimatur is insufficient to convey prevailing party status
  • recognizing that a so ordered settlement can support an IDEA attorneys' fee award but declining to award fees in case where court did not so order or exercise continuing jurisdiction over settlement
  • recognizing that a so ordered settlement can support an IDEA attorneys’ fee award but declining to award fees in case where court did not so order or exercise continuing jurisdiction over settlement
  • noting that some settlement agreements may confer prevailing-party status if sufficiently analogous to a consent decree
  • explaining that “judicially sanctioned relief” other than a judgment or consent decree will confer prevailing party status under Buckhannon
  • holding that Buckhannon is applicable to the IDEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Kanne, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.