· 11/14/2003
T.D. v. Lagrange School District No. 102
Citations
- 349 F.3d 469
- 3 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 755
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23236
- 2003 WL 22682466
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a private settlement without judicial imprimatur is insufficient to convey prevailing party status
- recognizing that a so ordered settlement can support an IDEA attorneys' fee award but declining to award fees in case where court did not so order or exercise continuing jurisdiction over settlement
- recognizing that a so ordered settlement can support an IDEA attorneys’ fee award but declining to award fees in case where court did not so order or exercise continuing jurisdiction over settlement
- noting that some settlement agreements may confer prevailing-party status if sufficiently analogous to a consent decree
- explaining that “judicially sanctioned relief” other than a judgment or consent decree will confer prevailing party status under Buckhannon
- holding that Buckhannon is applicable to the IDEA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Kanne, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.