TC v. Valley Central School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that individuals could not be held liable under Title VI in either his or her personal or official capacity
• describing disagreement among district courts within the Second Circuit on this question
• “The Supreme Court has rejected the notion that victims of peer harassment have a right under Title VI to make particular remedial demands.”
• citation 1 Courts generally treat ADA and RA claims identically. See Henrietta D. v. Bloomberg, 331 F.3d 261, 272 (2d Cir. 2003
• court may find deliberate indifference when the “defendant’s response to known discrimination is clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances or when remedial action only follows after a lengthy and unjustified delay”
• minority student stated a claim for intentional discrimination under Title VI by alleging school officials reacted differently to white and minority participants in incidents, including failing to punish minority students who harassed student plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).