Taylor Woodrow Blitman Construction Corp. v. Southfield Gardens Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff may have an unjust-enrichment claim against one who would arguably have had the status of a third-party beneficiary under the non-existent or unenforceable contract
• explaining that a plaintiff may have an unjust-enrichment claim against one who would arguably have had the status of a third-party beneficiary under the non- existent or unenforceable contract
• general contractor, to whom there was no binding promise to pay, is not a third party beneficiary of building loan agreement between owner and lender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).