Taylor Wofford v. City of Laramie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “corroborating evidence may be required in certain circumstances” including where applicant “fails to put forth corroboration that should be readily available”
• holding that IJ need not “identify the specific evidence necessary to meet the applicant’s burden of proof”
• holding that an 12 applicant “bears the ultimate burden of introducing such 13 evidence without prompting from the IJ”
• holding that “alien bears the ultimate burden of introducing . . . evidence without prompting from the IJ”
• holding that “the alien bears the 14 ultimate burden of introducing such evidence without prompting from the IJ” 15 (quoting Chuilu Liu, 575 F.3d at 198)
• concluding that a statement from a spouse “is not unique with 6 respect to an asylum claim” such that a continuance is merited to obtain the 7 statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).