Taylor v. Waddey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing writ of mandamus and noting certiorari is designed to review and examine the proceedings of lower tribunals, to ascertain their validity, and to correct errors of law made by these bodies where there has been some judicial action
• comparing writ of mandamus and noting certiorari is designed to review and examine the proceedings of lower tribunals, to ascertain their validity, and to correct errors of law made by these bodies where there has been some judicial action
• comparing writ of mandamus and noting certiorari is designed to review and examine the proceedings of lower tribunals, to ascertain their validity, and to correct errors of law made by these bodies where there has been some judicial action
• trial courts have “inherent power” to adopt “reasonable regulations” governing bondsmen who appear before them
• while solvency of state-authorized bondsman could not be questioned, 334 S.W.2d 734, trial court could suspend his right to furnish bonds, after notice and hearing, for (unspecified) good cause relating to ethical misconduct in his bail business before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).