Taylor v. Village of N. Palm Beach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the standard of proof for a facial taking is whether the regulation at issue has resulted in deprivation of all economic use
• explaining a facial challenge is based on the mere enactment of a regulation, whereas an as-applied claim is based on a specific application for development
• explaining a facial challenge is based on the mere enactment of a regulation, whereas an as-applied claim is based on a specific application for development
• discussing various categories of takings and stating that “[i]n an as-applied claim, the landowner challenges the regulation in the context of a concrete controversy specifically regarding the impact of the regulation on a particular parcel of property.”
• \Florida courts have adopted the federal ripeness policy.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).