Skip to main content
· 3/31/2003

Taylor v. U.S. Department of Justice

Citations

  • 257 F. Supp. 2d 101
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5169
  • 2003 WL 1740430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that FD-302 reports contained in the FBI's Central Records System \arc wholly exempt under [Privacy Act] exemption (j)(2)\
  • suggesting that disclosure of potentially exculpatory Brady information is in a plaintiff’s private interest, not the general public interest
  • “The FBI’s investigations systems have also been exempted [from the Privacy Act] by the Department of Justice in regu lations found at 28 C.F.R. § 16.96.”
  • where defendant’s declaration and Vaughn index sufficiently provide court -with information about nature of redactions, no further in camera review is needed to further assist court in deciding whether disclosure is required
  • disclosure under the FOIA of potentially exculpatory information that prosecutors must disclose to criminal defendants pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), is in a plaintiff’s private interest, not the general public interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.