· 3/31/2003
Taylor v. U.S. Department of Justice
Citations
- 257 F. Supp. 2d 101
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5169
- 2003 WL 1740430
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that FD-302 reports contained in the FBI's Central Records System \arc wholly exempt under [Privacy Act] exemption (j)(2)\
- suggesting that disclosure of potentially exculpatory Brady information is in a plaintiff’s private interest, not the general public interest
- “The FBI’s investigations systems have also been exempted [from the Privacy Act] by the Department of Justice in regu lations found at 28 C.F.R. § 16.96.”
- where defendant’s declaration and Vaughn index sufficiently provide court -with information about nature of redactions, no further in camera review is needed to further assist court in deciding whether disclosure is required
- disclosure under the FOIA of potentially exculpatory information that prosecutors must disclose to criminal defendants pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), is in a plaintiff’s private interest, not the general public interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.