Taylor v. United States Board of Parole. Taylor v. McGrath Attorney General of United States (Two Cases)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the “proper remedy [to challenge constitutionality of a conviction] is by way of habeas corpus of Title 28 Sec. 2255, United States Code”
• stating that a motion under § 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality of a statute under which a defendant is convicted
• stating that a motion under § 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality of a statute under which a defendant is convicted
• stating that a motion under Section 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality of a statute under which a defendant is convicted
• stating that a motion under § 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality of a statute under which a defendant is convicted
• stating that a motion under § 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality of a statute under which a defendant is convicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).