Taylor v. Taylor
Citations
- 970 N.W.2d 209
- 2022 ND 39
Syllabus
An attempted appeal from an order for judgment will be treated as an appeal from a subsequently entered consistent judgment, if one exists. A district court is generally not required to do a line-by-line best-interest analysis for each individual child, but factual findings should be stated with sufficient specificity for reviewing court to understand basis for its decision. Expert testimony is unnecessary for a showing that physical or emotional harm is likely to result from parenting time, and general testimony of a parent may suffice. Visitation with a noncustodial parent may be temporarily suspended where it is likely to endanger the children's physical or emotional health. District court order granting sole decisionmaking authority to custodial parent must be in the children's best interests. Visitation provisions controlled by custodial parent should be utilized only in exceptional circumstances and when custodial parent demonstrates willingness to foster parent-child relationship. Custodial parent may be permitted to monitor visitation between children and noncustodial parent.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the history and theory of presumption in North Dakota
- discussing the history and theory of presumption in North Dakota
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kershaw v. FinnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-09-01· cited 8×
- McCay v. McCayNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-07-05· cited 7×
- Sayler v. SaylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-08-17· cited 4×
- Interest of G.V.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-02-16· cited 3×
- Hoffman v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-02-16· cited 3×
- Adam F. v. Caitlin B.Alaska Supreme Court· 2024-07-12· cited 2×
- Vetter v. Vetter, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2026-02-12· cited 1×
- Markestad v. Markestad, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-12-31
- Ziemann v. GroszNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2026-01-15
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-25· cited 91×
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-03· cited 84×
- Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-02-17· cited 76×
- Hanson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-04-16· cited 37×
- Wigginton v. WiggintonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-02-16· cited 34×
- Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-04-06· cited 29×
- Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-03-22· cited 23×
- Curtiss v. CurtissNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-10-17· cited 22×
- Marquette v. MarquetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-07-18· cited 21×
- Dick v. ErmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-02-21· cited 15×
- State, County of Cass, Ex Rel. Seibold v. LeveringtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-09-25· cited 14×
- Schlieve v. SchlieveNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-05-28· cited 11×
- Bredeson v. MackeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-02-13· cited 9×
- Wilson v. IbarraNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-07-18· cited 7×
- Wisnewski v. WisnewskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-06-29· cited 5×
- Curtiss v. CurtissNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-03-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.