Skip to main content

Taylor v. Taylor

Citations

  • 1 So. 3d 348
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 565
  • 2009 WL 186155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a trial court should not admit parol evidence until it first determines that the terms of a contract are ambiguous”
  • explaining that in the absence of ambiguity, the actual language of a contract is the best evidence of the intent of the parties to that contract, and the actual language controls
  • stating a “trial court’s interpretation of a prenuptial agreement is reviewed de novo, as such agreements are governed by the law of contracts”
  • “Contract interpretation begins with a review of the plain language of the agreement because the contract language is the best evidence of the parties’ intent at the time of the execution of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf, Lewis, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.