Taylor v. Stymus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• uncontroverted allegation that defendant hauled freight within Pennsylvania insufficient to meet continuous and substantial test
• uncontroverted allegation that defendant hauled freight within Pennsylvania insufficient to meet continuous and substantial test
• facts insufficient to support exercise of jurisdiction where appellant failed to allege that appellee’s business activities in Pennsylvania were “continuous and substantial”
• facts insufficient to support exercise of jurisdiction where appellant failed to allege that appellee's business activities in Pennsylvania were \continuous and substantial\
• requiring “continuous and substantial” business activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).