Taylor v. Shigaki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the duty of good faith and fair dealing to uphold a contract and explaining that “the court will not give effect to interpretations that would render contract obligations illusory”
• “Because the decision to accept or reject settlement offers belongs to the client, Taylor’s interpretation of substantial performance would eviscerate the usefulness of contingency fee contracts.”
• contracts must be construed to avoid rendering contractual obligations illusory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).