Taylor v. Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the erroneous classification of predicate convictions as crimes of violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) did not render the defendants' NTAs invalid because those convictions could have been classified instead as theft offenses under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G
• providing that a defendant charged with illegal reentry can collaterally attack the validity of his underlying removal order
• noting that California robbery may be committed with an accidental use of force
• noting that California robbery may be committed with an accidental use of force
• conviction under California Penal Code § 211 is categorically an aggravated felony theft offense
• California Penal Code § 211 is categorically an aggravated felony theft offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).