Taylor v. Olsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the question of the landowner’s attention to the condition of his roadside trees under a general standard of reasonable care is to be decided as a question of fact and cannot be determined simply by classifying land as either urban or rural
• holding that the question of the landowner's attention to the condition of his roadside trees under a general standard of reasonable care is to be decided as a question of fact and cannot be determined simply by classifying land as either urban or rural
• tree’s inner rot was not visible so as to reasonably put owner on notice; treeowner not held liable
• obligation of property owner to use “reasonable care to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm” to adjacent road users from falling trees “is to be decided as a question of fact upon the circumstances of the individual case” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• obligation of property owner to use \reasonable care to prevent an unreasonable risk of harm\ to adjacent road users from falling trees \is to be decided as a question of fact upon the circumstances of the individual case\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• applying similar factors to determine reasonableness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).