· 4/24/2020
Taylor v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co.
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 2657
Syllabus
Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it determined the admissibility of evidence at trial. Judgment affirmed. FELA, negligence, causation, expert testimony, admissibility of evidence, abuse of discretion.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that after the family law court had dismissed a modification petition for lack of proof, it had no authority to make its own modifications
- holding that after the family law court had dismissed a modification petition for lack of proof it had no authority to make its own modifications
- stating that \[i]n the absence of substantial evidence establishing a nexus\ between a restricted parent's conduct and the adverse effect that concerns the court, a trial court errs in imposing restrictions
- reversal of trial court decision to deny mother’s modification petition but implement restrictions on the father on a basis that neither party had contemplated and was not supported by the record
- trial court abuses its discretion when it fails to follow statutory procedures
- trial court abuses its discretion when it fails to follow statutory procedures
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Osowik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.