Taylor v. New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that findings are not clearly erroneous when “[v]iewing the record as a whole, ‘[the court is] not left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’”
• explaining that findings are not clearly erroneous when “[v]iewing the record as a whole, ‘[the court is] not left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’”
• explaining that findings are not clearly erroneous when “[v]iewing the record as a whole, ‘[the court is] not left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’” (quoting United States v. Finley, 612 F.3d 998, 1003 (8th Cir. 2010)
• “[T]he focus is on whether the act was done in furtherance of the business, not whether the act was defined within an employee’s duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).