Taylor v. National Temperance Relief Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant could not “claim [that] the trial court erred by using the very standard he had [earlier] asked the court to apply”
• holding that “fundamental fairness requires that official information concerning prospective jurors utilized by the State in jury selection be reasonably available to the defendant”
• affirming the defendant’s conviction, despite finding that he had been subjected to an unfair adjudicatory procedure, because he failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the procedure
• \We disagree that the defendant had no interest in knowing the criminal histories of the potential replacement jurors.\
• under “invited error” doctrine, party may not avail himself of error into which he has led the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).