· 1/13/2014
Taylor v. Nabors Drilling USA, LP
Citations
- 222 Cal. App. 4th 1228
- 166 Cal. Rptr. 3d 676
- 2014 WL 114036
- 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that California trial court’s failure to “specify the factors it had considered” when deciding whether to apply fee multiplier did “not compel a reversal”
- “[a] plaintiff who 16 does not perceive the workplace as hostile or abusive will not prevail, even if it objectively is so”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yegan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.