Skip to main content
· 1/13/2014

Taylor v. Nabors Drilling USA, LP

Citations

  • 222 Cal. App. 4th 1228
  • 166 Cal. Rptr. 3d 676
  • 2014 WL 114036
  • 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that California trial court’s failure to “specify the factors it had considered” when deciding whether to apply fee multiplier did “not compel a reversal”
  • “[a] plaintiff who 16 does not perceive the workplace as hostile or abusive will not prevail, even if it objectively is so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yegan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.