Taylor v. Mobil Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that requiring proof only that the injury arose in “the course of” the employment is referred to as positional risk doctrine
• finding that question of corroboration was properly submitted to the jury, when two disinterested witnesses corroborated the substance of essential portions of the adverse party’s testimony
• physician who had allowed his license to lapse not entitled to the protection of die statutory cap because he was not a “health care provider” within the meaning of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).