Skip to main content
· 4/8/1992

Taylor v. Metropolitan Dade County

Citations

  • 596 So. 2d 798
  • 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4253
  • 1992 WL 69035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing for further proceedings to determine whether the use of a medical device provided “a basis for tolling the statute”
  • reversing and remanding for findings of fact where JCC found statute of limitations barred claimant’s claim, but did not address claimant’s testimony that back brace had been prescribed and that claimant wore back brace off and on during critical two-year time period
  • order reversed for findings as to whether the employer had actual knowledge of the claimant’s continued use of a back brace

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.