Taylor v. Just

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts should apply the plain meaning of the terms if they are “clear and unambiguous”
• stating that courts should apply the plain meaning of the terms if they are \clear and unambiguous\
• stating that courts should apply the plain meaning of the terms if they are “clear and unambiguous”
• upholding the foreclosure trustee's authority to rescind the sale and refuse to deliver a deed without exposure to contract damages where the bank's email to the trustee advising it had promised the owner not to proceed with the sale went astray
• “On July 17, 2001, the Rushes and Fairbanks Capital executed a contract entitled ‘Forbearance Agreement’ (Agreement) which addressed the Rushes’ default.... The Agreement provided that if the Rushes made the payments as modified, Fairbanks Capital would not proceed with the foreclosure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).