Taylor v. JFC STAFFING ASSOCIATES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a twelve-day gap between plaintiff's protected activity and adverse action was “sufficiently ‘unusually suggestive’” to infer causal connection
• finding twelve days between the protected activity and the adverse employment action sufficient to support a Title VII retaliation claim
• finding twelve days between the protected activity and the adverse employment action sufficient to support a Title VII retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).