Taylor v. Jay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the ALJ erred in assessing an RFC of Plaintiff who had multiple severe impairments without the benefit of any opinion evidence as to Plaintiff’s functional limitations
• “The Court agrees with [p]laintiff that the ALJ in this case erred in assessing [p]laintiff’s RFC in the absence of any medical opinion.”
• “The [c]ourt agrees with [p]laintiff that the ALJ in this case erred in assessing [p]laintiff’s RFC in the absence of any medical opinion.”
• “[w]hile in some circumstances, an ALJ may make an RFC finding without treating source opinion evidence, the RFC assessment will be sufficient only when the record is ‘clear’ and contains ‘some useful assessment of the claimant’s limitations from a medical source’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).