Taylor v. Hustead & Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the number of weekly hours the putative employee actually worked for the employer” and “whether the putative employee even sought other work in the field” are factors relevant in the matrix
• concluding that “the number of weekly hours the putative employee actually worked for the employer” and “whether the putative employee even sought other work in the field” are factors relevant in the matrix
• rejecting the notion that the absence of any showing that an individual provided services to a third party is dispositive proof of an employer/employee relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).