Skip to main content
· 4/9/1894

Taylor v. Fried

Citations

  • 161 Pa. 53
  • 28 A. 993
  • 1894 Pa. LEXIS 631

Syllabus

<p>Partnership — Tenants in common — Presumption.</p> <p>A division of the product between tenants in common does not make them partners, although they may have contributed labor or money to raise it. Ro presumption of partnership arises from the mere fact of co-tenancy.</p> <p>Partnership — Joint purchase of goods.</p> <p>Persons who join in the purchase of goods, not for the purpose of selling them again but for the purpose of dividing the goods among themselves, are not partners and are not liable to third parties as if they were.</p>

Judges: Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.