Skip to main content
· 2/3/1995

Taylor v. Florida State Fair Authority

Citations

  • 875 F. Supp. 812
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1583
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 286
  • 1995 WL 49392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff’s actions did not constitute undue delay, but even if they had, the defendant would not be prejudiced from any resulting delay because the case is in the early stages of litigation
  • finding that denial on the basis of futility is improper where determination of a complex factual inquiry is required
  • finding that denial on the basis of futility is improper where determination of a complex factual inquiry is required
  • finding that denial on the basis of futility is improper where determination of a complex factual inquiry is required
  • finding that denial on the basis of futility is improper where determination of a complex factual inquiry is required
  • “[L]eave to amend should only be denied on the ground of futility when the proposed amendment is clearly insufficient or frivolous on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kovachevich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.