Taylor v. FIRST COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the relation-back doctrine should not be applied in this case” and overruling issue premised on its applicability
• concluding that “the relation-back doctrine should not be applied in this case” and overruling issue premised on its applicability
• holding that damages incurred by corporation for breach of contract were not a “certain amount of money” on the date that the contract was executed because no money was then owed nor had breach occurred
• holding that damages incurred by corporation for breach of contract were not a “certain amount of money” on the date that the contract was executed because no money was then owed nor had breach occurred
• stating that “legislative addition of this definition conflicts with the relation back doctrine” and constituted material change in law after relation-back cases were decided
• stating that “legislative addition of this definition conflicts with the relation back doctrine” and constituted material change in law after relation-back cases were decided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).