Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant manufacture could not be held strictly liable for “failure to warn of the dangers inherent in the asbestos-containing materials that were manufactured by others and used with respondents’ products”
• holding that defendant manufacture could not be held strictly liable for “failure to warn of the dangers inherent in the asbestos-containing materials that were manufactured by others and used with respondents’ products”
• holding that defendant manufacture could not be held strictly liable for “failure to warn of the dangers inherent in the asbestos-containing materials that were manufactured by others and used with respondents’ products”
• holding that defendant manufacture could not be held strictly liable for “failure to warn of the dangers inherent in the asbestos-containing materials that were manufactured by others and used with respondents’ products”
• holding that defendant manufacture could not be held strictly liable for “failure to warn of the dangers inherent in the asbestos-containing materials that were manufactured by others and used with respondents’ products”
• holding that defendant manufacture could not be held strictly liable for “failure to warn of the dangers inherent in the asbestos-containing materials that were manufactured by others and used with respondents’ products”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).