Skip to main content
· 10/14/1963

Taylor v. Connecticut

Citations

  • 375 U.S. 840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that slight damage to a fender sys- tem during “normal docking” may fall outside the purview of the presumption
  • arguing for the inappli- cability of the Oregon presumption where the vessel was properly piloted, the contact made with the fender system occurred during a “normal docking” and was minimal, and the fenders were defective
  • “the presumption derives from the common-sense observation that moving vessels do not usually collide with stationary objects unless the vessel is manhandled in some way”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.