Skip to main content

Taylor v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 61 Va. App. 13
  • 733 S.E.2d 129
  • 2012 Va. App. LEXIS 333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing for juror’s statements of pro-police bias without discussing the degree of impact of police testimony or credibility in the case
  • reversing conviction where a juror’s stated beliefs “start[ed] with the premise that he would believe a police officer over another witness”
  • “In conducting our review, we consider the juror’s entire voir dire, not merely isolated statements.” (citing Vinson v. Commonwealth, 258 Va. 459, 467 (1999))
  • “For that guarantee to be effective, persons accused of violating criminal laws must be provided with ‘an impartial jury drawn from a panel . . . free from exceptions.’ Every prospective juror must stand indifferent to the cause.” (quoting Breeden, 217 Va. at 300)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.