Court of Appeals of Virginia· 7/22/2008
Taylor v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 663 S.E.2d 536
- 52 Va. App. 388
- 2008 Va. App. LEXIS 330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the standard of review for insufficiency claims “gives full play to the responsibility of the trier of fact fairly to resolve conflicts in the testimony” (quoting Kelly v. Commonwealth, 41 Va. App. 250, 257-58 (2003) (en banc)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Annunziata
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Kelly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-08-05· cited 712×
- Air Courier Conference of America v. American Postal Workers UnionSupreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 368×
- Crowder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-11-12· cited 315×
- Wactor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-05-28· cited 291×
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-10-15· cited 274×
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-04-04· cited 117×
- Myers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-05-25· cited 38×
- Bryant v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-06-05· cited 24×
- Hodges v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-06-07· cited 20×
- Burrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-06-19· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.