Taylor v. CNA Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the nonmovant fails “to cite evidence in the record to dispute those facts, the facts ... identified are taken as true”
• holding where a nonmovant fails “to cite evidence in the record to dispute those facts, the facts ... identified are taken as true”
• finding coworkers' statements that plaintiff was \intimidating\ and \bullying\ not capable of defamation
• non-decisionmaker’s bias not relevant to the ultimate question of whether employer imposed discriminatory discipline
• “Where defendant identified facts in the record to support their motion for summary judgment, and Taylor failed to cite evidence in the record to dispute those facts, the facts defendants identified are taken as true.”
• where a defendant identifies facts in the record to support his motion for summary judgment, and the nonmovant fails “to cite evidence in the record to dispute those facts, the facts . . . identified are taken as true”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).