Taylor v. Cady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the tortfeasor was still acting in the course of employment because he was carrying out the duties of his employer— starting the car to leave the office and make a bank deposit—despite the injury falling within the parking lot exception of RCW 51.08.013
• although injury occurred in parking lot, coemployee was immune from liability because at the time of the alleged negligence he was performing work duties
• although injury occurred in parking lot, coemployee was immune from liability because at the time of the alleged negligence he was performing work duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).