Skip to main content
· 6/25/1952

Taylor v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship Clerks

Citations

  • 106 F. Supp. 438
  • 30 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2676
  • 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4020
  • 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “One court could determine that defendant’s conduct violated ERISA, while another court could conclude that it did not.”
  • claims that an ERISA health insurance plan violated ERISA by failing to calculate copayments in accordance with the plan arose from the same conduct and were therefore typical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Letts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.