· 9/29/2006
Taylor v. Brandner
Citations
- 937 So. 2d 869
- 2006 La. LEXIS 2746
- 2006 WL 2853003
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the multiple refilings expressly authorized by Connecticut’s savings statute must all be made within one year of the failure of the first action, described by the statute as the \original action\
- rejecting an interpretation of \original action\ as the first action that the court exercised jurisdiction over
- [a] statute should be read as a whole and interpreted so as to give effect to all of its provisions
- ‘[a] statute should be read as a whole and interpreted so as to give effect to all of its provisions’
- ‘[a] statute should be read as a whole and interpreted so as to give effect to all of its provisions’
- “[a] statute should be read as a whole and interpreted so as to give effect to all of its provisions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.