Taylor v. American Fabritech, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding experts’ testimony was reliable under analytical-gap test
• finding that payments made by employer’s insurance carrier pursuant to its accident policy covering occupational injuries did not constitute a collateral source and that nonsubscriber was entitled to offset
• “It is generally considered error for insurance coverage of either party to be mentioned by the other party during trial of a personal injury cause of action.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).