Taylor-Sammons v. Bath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since plaintiffs employment was terminated, she has no reasonable expectation of returning to covered employment.”
• “defendant should have been aware that plaintiffs complaint did not present a reasonable argument for removal based upon complete ... preemption.”
• “However, the mere existence of an ERISA plan is not enough for preemption; the state law in question must make reference to or function with respect to the ERISA plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).