Taylor Investment Corp. v. Weil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing that transmitting information prepared entirely by a third party negated the knowledge prong
• applying Minnesota law and granting summary judgment to defendant on plaintiff’s fraud claims, concluding that when parties were engaged in “an arms length business transaction” there was no duty to disclose omitted information
• “The existence of an express contract between parties precludes recovery under theories of quasi-contract. ...”
• parties agreed license agreement was governed by the UCC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).