Taylor, Gardiner & Co. v. Wooten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Mr. Hansmeier’s statement in response to a motion to dismiss on mootness grounds was presented “without any credentials or other indicia of expertise that qualify Hansmeier to make accessibility determinations”
• upholding the denial of attorney fees and costs because plaintiff delivered the documents to defense counsel, not defendant
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that serving defense counsel is sufficient because such “argument lacks the support of any rule of civil procedure and defies logic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).