Taylor Corporation v. Four Seasons Greetings, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court correctly applied extrinsic test to holiday greeting card designs by considering the cards’ “similar holiday themes, paper stock and printing techniques”
• holding that a bankruptcy court order approving an asset purchase agreement transferring intellectual property rights constituted transfer by operation of law
• observing that most circuits apply a clearly erroneous standard of review to factual finding of substantial similarity even though credibility is not implicated
• observing that most circuits apply a clearly erroneous standard of review to factual finding of sub- stantial similarity even though credibility is not implicated
• stating that presence of advisory jury does not change rule of deference to district court's findings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a)
• explaining that the focus should be on “the work[] taken as a whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).